Has the ‘found-footage’ horror had its time?

As a big time horror fan I’m always on the lookout for films that have a unique ‘scare factor’ that sets them apart from all others, presenting something unexpected and all-round terrifying. For a while this was the ‘found footage’ narrative technique, a newer style that placed the audience directly in the shoes of the central character, allowing them a better view of exactly what the characters were seeing and wanted you to see but at the same time restricting them at moments of tension when the character was incapacitated or simply not using the camera. It deviated from the norm in terms of story telling and drew the audiences into the world of the film more so than watching from an uninvolved perspective. The characters would seemingly communicate directly with the audience when talking to the camera.

In terms of horror this meant the audience were drawn in more by the narrative so reacted more to scares and tension. The different use of the camera also forced audiences to see more than they would normally and enjoy it more from a voyeuristic perspective. Characters suddenly became more realistic as backstories were more natural and genuine and more of the characters personal lives were shown. On the opposite side of the spectrum, the ‘found footage’ genre used minimal edits so while on the one hand it seemed more realistic and believable, on the other the lack of edits forced the audience to watch more horrific and terrifying scenes with lack of cuts to break them up.

When The Blair Witch Project was released in 1999, it was seen as one of the first of its kind to utilise the ‘found footage’ technique, the earlier films such as Cannibal Holocaust (1980) forgotten.the-blair-witch-project-poster
Plugging itself as a true story during its initial promotions The Blair Witch Project achieved huge success taking in $248.6 million at the box office despite its indie-horror production.Since then it has become one of the most popular sub-horror genres with successful franchises such as Paranormal Activity and Rec. They range from ghost hunting, location
exploration and documentary shooting based story lines with anything from one base camcorder to multiple CCTV cameras filming the unfolding events. But with the Paranormal Activity franchise reaching film number 6 and a sequel to The Blair Witch Project due for release in September, has the genre had its time?

The Blair Witch Project was the first horror film I ever watched and while I wasn’t scared by it, I loved the idea (in an almost morbid way) that it could have been real. I found it so engaging and such a unique way of telling the story that I was desperate for more. When Paranormal Activity was released in 2007 I was so ready for it. At my younger age, I did find it genuinely scary, feeling chilled as the almost ‘live action’ events were unfolding in front of me. I felt the tension each time the footage was fast forwarded and then played, looking eagerly around the frame to spot what spooky event would take place next.

paranormal-94

And then number two came out in 2010 and I loved the additional cameras used so that the different goings on that had taken place in the previous films off camera wouldn’t be missed in the newer story. I liked the way the story was linked and how it added further depth to what I already knew, making it somehow more chilling. Then number three came out a year later. There wasn’t enough time for the anticipation to build up so the excitement and hype for the film was non-existent. I went to see it nonetheless and was pleasantly surprised. I liked how the footage instantly became a little more believable with the grainy quality and was a little spooked but I think when you’re on your own watching a horror in an empty cinema, anyone is likely to be a bit on edge.

When the fourth came out in 2012 I was fed up with the franchise. There was nothing new the genre or franchise could add to up the ante or make the scares unexpected. It was just another repeat of exactly what the other films had done. For me this ruined the genre because realistically what more can be added to the genre to make it stand out?

As mentioned there are the other storylines that each have their own conventions and methods of progressing the narrative but again, once you’ve seen one characters unfolding events, the rest become the same. It then comes down to the story that is told to be unique. In 2014 As Above, So Below was released, an exploration storyline about the catacombs in France and it was brilliant.025192241253_Poster
The storyline was so different and unlike anything I’d personally seen before, what was shown by the camera was new and the scares so much better.

However, with the upcoming release of Blair Witch in September there really are very few unique storylines coming out at the moment to do the genre justice. Plugged as an exact follow on from the original, it follows the same basic concept with some of the exact same scares shown in the trailer. The ‘found footage’ technique is being drained, overused and just not scary anymore. Its time for a new genre to come into play or for writers to start coming up with new concepts.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s